the ineffective role of the united states in the syrian-israeli peace process during the 1990s

the end of cold war created a unique opportunity for both the arabs and israelis to end their animosity and for the united states to play an important role to bring them to peace negotiations. therefore, during the 1990s, the u.s. facilitated several rounds of talks between syria and israel, but the negotiations complicated gradually. the talks were stalled over the fact that israel did not want to withdraw from the golan heights prior to concluding security arrangements and normalization of relations with syria. there were variety of reasons that prevented syria and israel from reaching a peace agreement. besides, unresolved issues such as the golan heights, the biased role of the united states in the syrian-israeli talks left the process at an intractable impasse. the fact that the u.s. had strategic relations with israel and due to the increasing power of the zionist lobby in the u.s. congress, washington failed to be an honest broker. both syrian and israeli inflexibility, mutual mistrust and suspicious along with tentative and conditional nature of talks were proved hindrances. the u.s. could play an active role through urging both damascus and tel aviv to comply with the basic and logical needs of peace, pushing the israelis to withdraw from the syrian territory, urging the syrians to moderate their positions-allowing new demarcation of border-strengthening confidence-building measures between the parties and assuring them that peace will provide their basic needs, and in no way will the conflict be settled at the expense of either’s interests.